I am not biased towards anyone or anything - no matter
what. I try my best to be as objective as possible and whatever I write - I do
after thorough research and careful deliberation. To the best of my knowledge
and ability, that is. So, with that anticipatory bail, let me begin my latest
post.
Frankly, I think we are very callous about our own
history, culture and heritage. We neglect history, but there is no present and
no future - without the past. [Note: I tried my best to not let this one sound
like the latest potboiler from KJo's stable. So, pardon me, if it does.]
However that's not all, we have even bettered it by
letting foreigners to pen books about our history, culture and heritage; while
we have become champions at rote learning and this has been our bane - for several
centuries now, or perhaps a millennium.
We have - as a nation - outsourced the documentation and
writing of our history, culture and heritage to foreigners - including the ones
that have colonized us! We are more than happy to read those books and extremely
content - to learn by rote - all that rests within their pages. Our generosity
of spirit - is immeasurable indeed.
However rote learning of anything, even of our own history
or culture - written by foreigners - is not the way forward. That is not how
clarity comes or knowledge imparted.
And if we were to recollect
what Lord Curzon (Viceroy to India from 1899-1905) wrote in his letter to Queen
Victoria: that in order to keep up their superiority of race, culture, heritage
and history - they needed to have colonized countries and colonized people, or
words to that effect. Ever wondered what that says about their mindset?
Yet, how many of us have tried to know about the reign of
say, Samrat Chandragupta Vikramaditya?
Very few! We have quite happily restricted him to Vikram
and Betal.
How many of us have cared to learn about Chanakya,
Varahamihir, Aryabhatta and Sushruta? How many of us have tried to or even
wanted to read and know about our great warriors and freedom fighters?
A small faction amongst a multitude of item number addicts,
no?
Umm, I recently discovered that chocolate consumption in
India has nearly trebled since 2005. Though I continue to wonder why it doesn't
reflect on our population graph then?!
But let me not digress.
Frankly, our history is a mix of
lies and half-truths. We need to come out of this intellectual bog, this mind numbing
quicksand - this double trap of rote learning + letting foreigners to write our
history. We need to
separate the grain from the chaff, 'coz it is us that has given the chaff the
status of the grain - if I may say so.
But there's one more thing that
piques my curiosity no end and that is the origin of the modern day Europeans - those who wield
all the influence and power today.
A couple of millenniums ago several destructive
martial and warlike clans and tribes abounded - in various parts of modern
Asia.
Samrat Chandragupta Vikramaditya drove away many
such mercenaries and tribes - the Sakas and the Huns (white and red) - are some
examples, from modern Asia and established his writ over these lands.
Hannibal overran Europe and I presume destroyed a
lot of their ingenious culture and people. Attila the Hun ravaged Europe too.
But, what happened to the progeny of these
marauding hordes??
Hopefully they aren't writing our history and holding
forth on our culture and heritage. Or forcibly brainwashing us into
believing this fictitious Aryan Invasion Theory and racial superiority, among
others?! Not that we are not to be blamed - for lapping it all up - without question.
Strangely, even our ancient itihasa
(history) have been termed as mythology and epic and turned into fables
of 'victory of good over evil' - when we simply do not have this concept of 'evil'.
Now, lets turn our attention towards
Alexander the Great. The freshly minted PM of Pakistan - Raja Parvaiz Ashraf - is a Rajput from the Potohar region of Punjab. But the Potohar region of Punjab
is famous for another Raja - Raja Paurav (also known as King Porus).
Our history tells us that the
mighty Alexander defeated him, yet folklore in that area and its surroundings
tell a different story.
There
is a line of thought that Alexander the Great fought three major wars in his
life and won two. And that the third one was papered over by the Greek
historians - because he lost it - beaten back by the forces of Raja Paurav and
the ancient Persians. And that this defeat stopped him from plundering
this fabled land - of her riches.
That the
story of his 'magnanimity' with Porus could very likely be a fantasy - to keep
Alexander's aura intact?
Ancient
India was a land of immense wealth and knowledge. Hordes of conquerors have charged
in - some of them multiple times - in order to loot and plunder and carry away
vast quantities of her wealth. What made Alexander - a marauding conqueror
himself - suddenly turn altruistic?
And who are the original
inhabitants of Europe or America? Who are the indigenous people - of these
lands?
If we look at the ones who are
clustered in some parts of Europe: the Swedes, the Norwegians - I mean, the Scandinavian
people: they are very different.
Unfortunately, the death of several languages and tribes,
as well as the systematic conversion of indigenous people or adivashis (tribals) - all over the world, to some or the other organized religion - has had devastating
effects vis-à-vis written and oral history, heritage, scriptures, languages, culture
and folklore. We simply have no idea of what has been lost - forever.
I wonder how much of our culture, heritage and history has
been destroyed - thanks to the marauders from the west and the east (aided and
abetted by home grown vested interests). How many of our ancient monuments have
been captured and then renamed? And how many of them destroyed?
Perhaps our forefathers were prudent and farsighted, and
therefore locked in our history, etc in coded texts and/or camouflaged
language. We have not been able to unlock.
Yet sadly, we pay no attention to the Gupta era - especially to that of Samrat Chandragupta Vikramaditya, whose reign encompassed
vast lands and predated Islam. We seem to have not only forgotten him, but also
buried him deep - in the sands of time. He faded off the pages, while we
banished him from our collective psyche. We periodically and selectively
remember Samrat Asoka - but only to emphasize on his embracing 'ahimsa' (non-violence)
bit and extolling of Buddhism.
But, what is it that played a major role in ensuring that
we fell to barbaric and marauding hordes? Why is it that despite a glorious
ancient history and a very prosperous early medieval era ... we suddenly declined
so rapidly ... and have never recovered ever since?
Frankly, I wonder why there has never been an
attempt to understand what has been the impact of Buddhism - when it flourished - on the society, over a period of time; especially its message of peace and ahimsa.
And whether there has been a misunderstanding or misinterpretation somewhere.
Samrat Chandragupta Maurya's
reign was also a golden era, and he too was a great Emperor and a very able administrator - also attested by the ancient Greek historian and diplomat, Megasthenes (the author
of an account of ancient India, the Indica, in four books).
While Samrat Chandragupta Vikramaditya, to my mind, was and
is the greatest Emperor - to have walked on this planet - in the current era: the Kaliyug.
He was paternal and nurturing - of his praja (subjects), without having
embraced Buddhism.
His empire stretched from Bali to the Baltic and from
Korea to ancient Arvasthan. [Note: Arva in Sanskrit means, 'horse' and sthan refers
to, 'land or place' - Arvasthan therefore signifies the land of
horses.]
A lion-hearted, noble, generous, erudite and dutiful
ruler, he was devoted to the welfare of his praja - his people, even
those from vanquished lands. No subjugation, slave-taking, opium-cultivation,
burning and pillaging for him. No discrimination on the basis of language,
customs or colour of skin. Once he conquered a land, he did not indulge in rape
and plunder nor leave behind devastated cities and rotting corpses, unlike the
marauding hordes that came in from the east and the west and perpetuated untold
atrocities over us - the vanquished people and land.
Vikramaditya reintroduced the Vedic way of life, built
beautiful monuments, imparted education and established law and order; his paternal
and filial rule ended an uneasy period of turmoil and ignorance, ushering in an
era of tranquility in these conquered lands. This IS ahimsa my friend - the true
essence of the doctrine of ahimsa. What phoren and phony
pundits' have been preaching to us is pathetic, leading us to a dead-end.
Ahimsa concocted and Ahimsa imported - have only made us
bite the dust. As to why various forces and nations are only too keen to serve
us this version of ahimsa - I know not.
However, we continue to conveniently
ignore that sthan is a Sanskrit word, meaning land or place. And despite
the passage of time and various isms cropping up - the names of various nations
stand testimony even today - silently proclaiming their Vedic heritage.
Still, we take no interest in learning about the ancient Kambuja Desa or Suvarnadvipa - the ancient
Indian Colonies in the Far East.
And our history books are silent about the Egyptian king
Tushratta and the queen Sitamen.
Parting Shot: The way things are ... I won't be surprised if we are also
told that some Greco-Romans disguised as Rishi Valmiki and Maharishi Vedvyasa -
penned the Ramayan and the Mahabharat!
Incidently i am reading chanakya's chant which is about chandragupta! Found your post extra interesting! Btw have you read shashi tharoor's the great indian novel? You may find it interesting!
ReplyDelete@ Preeti: Great! Do share your thoughts once you are done. Btw, it is about Chanakya too.
ReplyDeletePS: I am not fond of any cattleist :)